On 15 September 2026, I watched U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent testify live before the House Financial Services Committee while simultaneously studying Bitcoin through my complete macro-to-micro trading setup.
Bitcoin was already presenting developing information across the charts. Rather than assuming what the Secretary might say or trying to predict how the market should react, I followed the evidence available in real time.
I entered a BTC long position at 75,789.0 and later exited at 77,188.0, capturing a 1,399-point move.
TRADE SUMMARY
• Asset: BTCUSD perpetual contract
• Direction: Long
• Entry: 75,789.0
• Entry time: 8:23:34 PM IST
• Exit: 77,188.0
• Exit time: 11:05:45 PM IST
• Bitcoin points captured: 1,399
• Underlying price movement captured: Approximately 1.85%
• Time in the trade: Approximately 2 hours 42 minutes
• Live macro context: U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s testimony before the House Financial Services Committee
The official title of the hearing was “The Annual Testimony of the Secretary of the Treasury on the State of the International Financial System.” It began at 10:00 AM in Washington, D.C.—7:30 PM in India—and Secretary Bessent was the listed witness.
My trade began approximately 53 minutes after the scheduled start of the hearing.
A REAL TRADE, NOT A CHART ANNOTATED AFTERWARDS
It is easy to open a historical chart after a move has finished, locate the lowest and highest points, and explain why the trade appears obvious.
Real-time trading is very different.
At the moment of entry, the final outcome is unknown. Price may expand, reverse, sweep liquidity, produce a false breakout or remain trapped inside a range. A live policymaker appearance adds another layer of uncertainty because an unexpected answer, policy remark or change in tone can rapidly alter market expectations.
This trade was taken and managed while the event was still unfolding. The entry at 75,789.0 and exit at 77,188.0 are recorded executions—not theoretical levels selected afterwards.
That distinction matters because good trading should be evaluated by the quality of the real-time process, not by the perfection of a hindsight explanation.
1. THE HEARING WAS CONTEXT—NOT A STANDALONE TRADING SIGNAL
The U.S. Treasury Secretary can influence market expectations through remarks concerning economic growth, financial stability, international finance, government borrowing, sanctions, banking, regulation and other policy matters.
That makes such testimony relevant to a macro-aware trader. It does not mean that the appearance itself provides a buy or sell signal.
I did not enter simply because Secretary Bessent was speaking. Nor did I assume beforehand that Bitcoin would rise.
The hearing formed part of the market environment. The trade decision came from the developing alignment across my charts—from macro context down to the lower timeframes used for execution.
This is an important separation:
• The calendar identifies when unusual information and volatility may enter the market.
• The charts show how market participants are actually responding.
• Risk management determines whether and how a trade can be taken.
A scheduled event can prepare us to pay closer attention. It cannot remove uncertainty.
2. MACRO-TO-MICRO ANALYSIS HELPED CREATE CLARITY
Before entering, I reviewed Bitcoin through the same multi-timeframe process that I use for important trades.
The higher timeframes helped me understand the broader structure and meaningful areas of liquidity. Intermediate timeframes helped me evaluate the developing move, compression, acceptance and rejection. Lower timeframes helped me judge execution more precisely.
No single indicator, candle or timeframe was asked to make the entire decision.
The objective was to find agreement between layers:
• The wider macro environment
• Higher-timeframe structure
• Nearby liquidity and value areas
• Intermediate-timeframe behaviour
• Lower-timeframe evidence for execution and management
This approach does not eliminate risk, but it reduces the temptation to react emotionally to one dramatic candle or one sentence from a live broadcast.
3. THE TRADE WAS TAKEN BEFORE FULL CLARITY EXISTED
One of the most valuable ideas in trading is what I call “pre-clarity.”
After a large move, clarity appears abundant. The breakout is visible, the momentum is obvious and the chart seems to explain itself. But by that stage, a meaningful portion of the opportunity may already have passed.
Pre-clarity does not mean guessing early. It means acting when sufficient evidence has developed—even though the market has not yet made the eventual outcome obvious to everyone.
My long entry at 75,789.0 came while the hearing was in progress and the future path remained uncertain. The decision was based on the information available at that moment, not on knowledge of the later price.
The purpose of a structured system is not to wait for absolute certainty, because markets never provide it. The purpose is to recognise when multiple independent forms of evidence have become strong enough to justify carefully managed risk.
4. STAYING WITH THE MOVE WAS PART OF THE EXECUTION
Finding an entry is only one part of a trade. Remaining in a profitable position while price continues to fluctuate can be equally difficult.
Bitcoin did not need to move in a perfectly straight line from 75,789.0 to 77,188.0. During a live catalyst, brief pullbacks and changes in short-term momentum can easily create the urge to close too early.
I remained with the position for approximately two hours and forty-two minutes. The exit at 77,188.0 secured a 1,399-point movement in the underlying Bitcoin price.
This does not mean that 77,188.0 was the only correct exit or that every future trade should be held for a similar duration. Trade management must respond to the structure, momentum, risk and evidence present in that particular market.
The meaningful point is that the entry, holding decision and exit were all parts of one continuous process.
5. IMPORTANT EVENTS EXTEND BEYOND CPI, NFP AND THE FOMC
Economic releases such as CPI, NFP and PCE, along with central-bank decisions, are widely recognised as market catalysts. However, today’s experience reinforced the importance of watching a broader range of scheduled events.
Testimony and public appearances by senior policymakers can also coincide with meaningful volatility, particularly when they concern the financial system, fiscal policy, regulation, debt, international finance or other subjects capable of changing expectations.
These events should therefore be included in a serious catalyst calendar when their subject matter is potentially relevant.
However, temporal overlap is not proof of causation. Bitcoin rose materially while Secretary Bessent was testifying, but multiple forces may have been operating simultaneously. Without sufficiently detailed evidence connecting particular remarks to particular cross-asset reactions, it would be careless to say that the testimony alone caused the entire move.
The disciplined conclusion is narrower and more useful: the scheduled hearing identified a period in which market-sensitive information could emerge, while price structure and the charts provided the evidence for the trade.
6. PREPARATION CAN BE MORE VALUABLE THAN PREDICTION
I did not need to know every question that members of the Committee would ask. I did not need to predict every answer Secretary Bessent would give. I also did not need to decide in advance that Bitcoin must move upward.
What I needed was preparation:
• Awareness of the scheduled hearing
• A complete macro-to-micro chart review
• Clearly understood market structure
• Attention to liquidity and price behaviour
• An evidence-based entry
• Active management while new information entered the market
Prediction tries to be certain about the future. Preparation creates the ability to respond intelligently as the future unfolds.
That difference is central to my continuing development as a trader.
7. WHAT THIS TRADE ADDS TO MY CONTINUING RESEARCH
Every trade—whether profitable or not—should contribute something to the next stage of learning.
This trade adds several useful observations to my ongoing market research:
- Senior policymaker testimony deserves systematic attention as a potential volatility window.
- The event itself should never replace chart-based evidence.
- Macro-to-micro alignment can help prevent impulsive reactions to live headlines.
- Pre-clarity is not prediction; it is the point at which sufficient evidence appears before the outcome becomes obvious.
- Entry quality and the ability to remain with a valid move must be studied together.
- Post-trade analysis must distinguish timing from causation.
These observations will be documented and compared with future catalyst-driven market behaviour. One successful trade does not establish a universal rule. Repeated observation, testing and honest review are necessary before any pattern deserves greater confidence.
FINAL REFLECTION
On 15 September 2026, Bitcoin offered a meaningful move during an important live U.S. policy hearing. By combining event awareness with macro-to-micro chart analysis, I entered long at 75,789.0 and exited at 77,188.0, capturing 1,399 Bitcoin points.
The most important result was not merely the size of the movement.
It was the process.
Markets will always contain uncertainty. A trader’s work is not to remove that uncertainty, but to prepare carefully enough to make disciplined decisions within it.
Preparation can be more valuable than prediction.
SOURCE
U.S. House of Representatives Committee Repository—The Annual Testimony of the Secretary of the Treasury on the State of the International Financial System, 15 September 2026:
https://docs.house.gov/committee/Calendar/ByEvent.aspx?EventID=119546
Shakti Saran
— Trader Shakti
www.tradershakti.com
I am not a financial advisor or certified trading professional. Trader Shakti shares my personal trading experiences, observations and reflections for educational, informational and motivational purposes.
Disclaimer
The information provided in this article and on Trader Shakti is for educational and informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial, investment or trading advice, or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any financial instrument or digital asset.
Any trades, market observations, strategies or examples discussed are shared only as historical or educational illustrations. They should not be considered predictions, trading signals or representations of future performance.
Past performance does not guarantee future results. Market conditions can change rapidly, and no trading method, analysis or strategy can eliminate the risk of loss.
Risk Disclaimer
Trading and investing in financial markets—including equities, cryptocurrencies, derivatives, options, futures and indices—involve substantial risk and may not be suitable for all investors.
Leveraged products can magnify both gains and losses, and in some circumstances losses may exceed the amount initially committed.
Readers should:
- Trade or invest only with risk capital they can afford to lose
- Fully understand the instruments and risks involved
- Use appropriate position sizing and risk-management techniques
- Conduct their own independent research and analysis
- Consider their financial circumstances, objectives and risk tolerance
- Seek advice from an appropriately qualified or SEBI-registered financial advisor, where applicable, before making financial or investment decisions
The website owner, author and contributors are not responsible for financial losses or other consequences arising from decisions made on the basis of information published on this website. All trading and investment decisions remain the reader’s own responsibility and are made at their own risk and discretion.